Social SciencesReview ArticlePublished 7/2/2026 · 61 views12 downloadsDOI 10.66308/air.e2026052

Before the Algorithm: Human Content Acquisition, Rights Metadata, and Taste-Making in Streaming Platforms

Tatiana KosenkoIndependent Researcher
Received 6/22/2026Accepted 6/30/2026
streaming platformscontent acquisitionrecommender systemsrights metadatataste-makingOTT servicesalgorithmic curationmedia industry studies
Download PDF
Cover: Before the Algorithm: Human Content Acquisition, Rights Metadata, and Taste-Making in Streaming Platforms

Abstract

Streaming platforms are often analyzed through the visible operations of their recommender systems: personalized rows, rankings, thumbnails, search results, and "because you watched" prompts. Existing scholarship has shown that such systems participate in algorithmic taste-making, influence aesthetic choice, and shape the cultural visibility of audiovisual works. Less attention has been paid, however, to the upstream professional and institutional processes through which content becomes available for recommendation in the first place. This article introduces the concept of pre-algorithmic acquisition infrastructure to describe the human, legal, commercial, and metadata-based practices through which audiovisual works are selected, licensed, classified, localized, positioned, and made operationally available before algorithmic recommendation occurs. The term pre-algorithmic is used as an analytical distinction rather than a strict chronological claim: acquisition and commissioning may themselves be informed by platform data, but they still perform the infrastructural work of making titles legally available, metadata-enabled, and operationally actionable for future recommendation. Using a structured analytical review and conceptual framework development approach, the article proposes a five-layer model of streaming curation: acquisition curation, rights curation, metadata curation, algorithmic curation, and interface curation. It further introduces recommendation-readiness, exploitation content, exploration content, and bridge content to explain how acquisition strategy shapes what platforms can recommend, personalize, and monetize. The central argument is that algorithms personalize choice, but acquisition infrastructure produces the conditions of choice.

Cite asTatiana Kosenko (2026). Before the Algorithm: Human Content Acquisition, Rights Metadata, and Taste-Making in Streaming Platforms. American Impact Review. https://doi.org/10.66308/air.e2026052Copy

Data availability

No new empirical data were generated or analyzed in this study.

Ethics statement

This study did not involve human participants, animals, or personally identifiable data and did not require ethics approval.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Competing interests

The author declares no conflict of interest.