American Impact ReviewA Peer-Reviewed Multidisciplinary Journal
Journal
JournalGetting StartedSubmission GuidelinesWhat We PublishWhy Publish With UsSubmit a Manuscript
About
AboutAbout the JournalEditorial BoardPeer ReviewersIndexing & RecognitionAuthor GuidelinesFor ResearchersReviewer GuidelinesEthics & PoliciesContact
Explore
ExploreBrowse ArticlesSubmit a Manuscript
Log inSign up
Browse ArticlesSubmit a Manuscript
JournalGetting StartedSubmission GuidelinesWhat We PublishWhy Publish With Us
AboutAbout the JournalEditorial BoardPeer ReviewersIndexing & RecognitionAuthor GuidelinesFor ResearchersReviewer GuidelinesEthics & PoliciesContact
AccountLog inSign up
American Impact Review
Peer-reviewed, open-access
multidisciplinary journal
Published by Global Talent Foundation
a 501(c)(3) nonprofit
Stay updated
Navigate
AboutFor AuthorsFor ResearchersReviewer GuidelinesPoliciesArchive
Legal & Contact
Privacy PolicyTerms of UsePublication EthicsContact Us
Indexed in:Crossref·Google Scholar·OpenAlex·Wikidata·Scilit
CC BY 4.0 · Open Access
ISSN 3071-124X · EIN: 33-2266959 · Verify on IRS.gov© 2026 American Impact Review
MarketingReview ArticlePublished 3/17/2026 · 974 views0 downloadsDOI 10.66308/air.e2026024

Consumer Trust in AI-Generated Marketing Content: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda

Kirill BaryshkovGlobal Media & Measurement Lead, L'Oréal HQ, Clichy, France
Yana KuzinaMarketing Manager, LeadingAge PA, USA
Iryna SmukHead of Marketing, BRKTHROUGH, USA
Mila TkachukDigital Marketing Manager, Burke Interiors, Los Angeles, USA
Received 2/21/2026Accepted 3/13/2026
AI-generated contentconsumer trustbrand authenticityAI disclosurepersuasion knowledgesystematic literature reviewMarketing
Download PDFGoogle ScholarRgResearchGateSemantic ScholarScilit
Cover: Consumer Trust in AI-Generated Marketing Content: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda

Abstract

Purpose. As generative artificial intelligence transforms marketing content production, questions about consumer trust have become urgent for both scholars and practitioners. This study systematically reviews the empirical and conceptual literature on consumer trust-related responses to AI-generated marketing content (AIGC), mapping antecedents, mediating mechanisms, moderating conditions, and downstream outcomes.

Design/methodology/approach. Following PRISMA 2020 reporting principles, a systematic search of Scopus and Google Scholar identified 59 records. After deduplication, screening, and eligibility assessment, 35 studies published between 2020 and 2026 were retained. Each study was coded along eleven dimensions including methodology, theoretical framework, independent and dependent variables, mediators, and moderators. Thematic synthesis organized findings into four themes: the disclosure dilemma, authenticity as central mediator, moderating conditions, and downstream outcomes.

Findings. AI disclosure activates persuasion knowledge and erodes trust-related outcomes across diverse marketing contexts, yet these effects are neither universal nor uniform. Perceived authenticity emerges as the primary mediating mechanism, with moral disgust operating as a parallel affective pathway. Content type (emotional versus rational), consumer AI literacy, cultural context, anthropomorphism cues, and disclosure framing moderate the strength and direction of effects. An integrative input-process-output framework synthesizes these findings.

Originality/value. To the authors' knowledge, this review provides one of the first focused syntheses of empirical and conceptual work on the trust construct in AI-generated marketing content. It proposes an integrative framework organizing antecedents, mediators, moderators, and outcomes, and advances five research propositions addressing habituation dynamics, cross-cultural variation, content-modality contingencies, disclosure framing, and behavioral measurement gaps.

Cite asKirill Baryshkov, Yana Kuzina, Iryna Smuk, Mila Tkachuk (2026). Consumer Trust in AI-Generated Marketing Content: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda. American Impact Review. https://doi.org/10.66308/air.e2026024Copy

Sections

    Article metrics

    Views974
    Downloads0